Over the water in British Columbia, Canada, the state government is appealing a judge’s ruling that people conceived by egg and sperm donation should be able to find out who their donor was.

Olivia Pratten and Shelley Deacon, both donor-conceived adults from BC, took the government to court arguing that donor-conceived people are discriminated against because adoption laws allow adopted people access to identifying information about their birth parents. There is no law that records should be kept for people conceived from sperm donation, so they are routinely destroyed. This makes it impossible to identify the donor and also to access information about their genetic health, which is important to the donor-conceived person and their children.
I find I have a vested interest in it not so much for myself, but for my children. There are diseases, illnesses, that skip generations, so I could unknowingly be passing something on to my children. That’s a bit scary.
Shelley Deacon
Part of the state government’s defence is that it is likely to significantly decrease the number of people offering to donate; donor numbers did not drop in the UK after 2005 and the number of sperm donors has started to go up.
The lawyers are arguing that UK law – amongst that of other countries such as Sweden and Australia – demonstrates a worldwide trend towards greater openness. It will be fascinating to see whether Canada follows this trend.


